August 04 2015 11:48:19
Navigation
Users Online
· Guests Online: 2

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 42
· Newest Member: rulee
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Looks good on paper: A flawed system for judging research is leading to academic fraud in China
InternacionalLooks good on paper: A flawed system for judging research is leading to academic fraud in China
Source: The Economist


DISGUISED as employees of a gas company, a team of policemen burst into a flat in Beijing on September 1st. Two suspects inside panicked and tossed a plastic bag full of money out of a 15th-floor window. Red hundred-yuan notes worth as much as $50,000 fluttered to the pavement below.

Money raining down on pedestrians was not as bizarre, however, as the racket behind it. China is known for its pirated DVDs and fake designer gear, but these criminals were producing something more intellectual: fake scholarly articles which they sold to academics, and counterfeit versions of existing medical journals in which they sold publication slots.

As China tries to take its seat at the top table of global academia, the criminal underworld has seized on a feature in its research system: the fact that research grants and promotions are awarded on the basis of the number of articles published, not on the quality of the original research. This has fostered an industry of plagiarism, invented research and fake journals that Wuhan University estimated in 2009 was worth $150m, a fivefold increase on just two years earlier.


Cont'.d

LINK:
http://www.economist.com/news/china/21586845-flawed-system-judging-research-leading-academic-fraud-looks-good-paper

Comments
No Comments have been Posted.
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Ratings
Rating is available to Members only.

Please login or register to vote.

No Ratings have been Posted.
Member Poll
¿Son las historias de ciencias de América Latina escritas en Estados Unidos “Orientalistas” a la Eduardo Said?

Si
Si
0% [0 Votes]

No
No
0% [0 Votes]

Tenemos que distinguir autores hispanos; no lo son.
Tenemos que distinguir autores hispanos; no lo son.
0% [0 Votes]

Incluimos autores hispanos como ‘orientalistas’ si trabajan en Estados Unidos
Incluimos autores hispanos como ‘orientalistas’ si trabajan en Estados Unidos
0% [0 Votes]

Tenemos que distinguir contenido y mensaje de obra
Tenemos que distinguir contenido y mensaje de obra
0% [0 Votes]

Toda obra escrita en America Latina no es ‘orientalista’
Toda obra escrita en America Latina no es ‘orientalista’
0% [0 Votes]

Toda obra que defienda ciencia latinoamericana no es ‘orientalista’
Toda obra que defienda ciencia latinoamericana no es ‘orientalista’
0% [0 Votes]

Depende
Depende
100% [1 Vote]

Votes: 1
You must login to vote.
Started: 11.07.15

Polls Archive
Latest Articles
· Informacion de Contacto
· Removimos Adobe Flash
· Recordando a nuestro...
· Sea of Storms (2015)...
· LASA 2015
· Math Latin America
· Ana Roque de Duprey
· Divulgación Ciencia
· Contaminación Vieques
· Estadisticas ciencia...
· No puedo...
· A vista de pájaro
· Dejenos saber
· Bienvenidos / Welcome
Forum Threads
Newest Threads
No Threads created
Hottest Threads
No Threads created
Latest Downloads
· Bitcoin: A Peer-to-P...
· Guia de Museos en Am...
· Jose María López Piñero
· Jose M. López Piñero
· On The Origin Of Spe...
1,142,745 unique visits